Harmless Error and Constitutional Remedies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Harmless error analysis: How do judges respond to confession errors?
In Arizona v. Fulminante (1991), the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door for appellate judges to conduct a harmless error analysis of erroneously admitted, coerced confessions. In this study, 132 judges from three states read a murder case summary, evaluated the defendant's guilt, assessed the voluntariness of his confession, and responded to implicit and explicit measures of harmless error. Res...
متن کاملcomparative comparision on Applying judicial remedies methods on the error of the administrative office
Error is instances of illegality,although there is a strong belief in the validity of the act,but judicial review of it can be accompanied by enforcement and judicial remedies.The court,in addition to the Certiorari in error of law cases in the verdict,can replace the true decision.The prohibitory order can only be made after the decision has been made by the public authority in order to prev...
متن کاملMeasurement error: effects and remedies in nutritional epidemiology.
Nutritional epidemiology is concerned to elucidate the relationship between intakes of specific foods and nutrients, and specified health outcomes. Usually the outcome of interest is the incidence of a disease. Typically epidemiological evidence for such a relationship exists at two levels: (1) the macro level, in which each data-point refers to an aggregation of subjects for example, a country...
متن کاملFederalism and Investor Protection: Constitutional Restraints on Preemption of State Remedies for Securities Fraud
During the past five years we have experienced unprecedented success in our capital markets, marked by a record number of registered public offerings, a record amount of capital raised in the primary market for securities, and a record volume and appreciation in our nation’s secondary markets for securities. For the first time, investors have invested more money in mutual funds than the amount ...
متن کاملMindless, Harmless, and Blameworthy
There is a compelling simplicity to the theoretical approach to moral judgment proposed by Gray, Young, and Waytz (this issue; henceforth GYW). On 10 their approach, all that is needed to account for the large body of empirical findings on moral judgment is a description of the prototypical moral encounter—a moral agent who brings harm to a moral patient. This is what psychological theorizing o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The University of Chicago Law Review
سال: 1994
ISSN: 0041-9494
DOI: 10.2307/1600089